Joe Childs and Tom Tobin of the St Petersburg Times have published another set of articles and videos exposing the criminality and abuse of the Church of Scientology called "The Money Machine".
Karin Pouw is a PR hack for the Church of Scientology International, who lies to the world about Scientologists not being pressured to go into debt. This is a report I wrote in 1999, while still a Scientologist, about my experiences at the Advanced Organization of Los Angeles - 12 years ago.
I left Scientology and started warning people about it within a year after this report was written because it had become clear to me that Scientology was incorrigibly criminal and abusive and that something must be done. I have continued to warn the public about Scientology, and your organization has continued its criminal and abusive practices.
**************
25 November 1999
RTC Reports Officer
Ethics Section AOLA
Qual AOLA
Deanna FCS AOLA
Tim Edwards AOLA
Alanzo
Solo Certainty Student
Things That
Shouldn't Be
1.
Pressuring
Scientologists to squirrel the application of standard finance policy to their
lives
2.
Routing a
student off course when no policy had been violated, and while the tech was
going in.
Since two weeks before my annual IAS membership expired, the
FCS AOLA has been working with me to renew my membership. Deanna began by
asking me to put my membership on a credit card and going into debt for it. I
told her that I have gotten myself $36,000 in debt and that this is a severely
out-ethics scene for me. I explained over multiple conversations, adding up to
many hours, that I had been applying ethics to this and reading LRH Finance
policy to turn this scene around.
I had not been applying standard admin for so long in this
area that it now threatened my progress on the Bridge and has even gotten me
close to bankruptcy. I told her that, instead of pressuring me into going
further into debt, that I needed her help me to apply standard finance policy
and to FP for this membership so that I could both apply policy and get my
membership paid for.
I arranged to pay $50 every week toward my membership. Each
time I paid my check to Deanna, she told me that I just needed to get my
membership now and to put it on a credit card. She accused me of being ARC
broken with the IAS. She repeatedly said that I "could do better than
this", that I was "selling my self short" by not just going into
debt and paying for it now. She said that I was "not some low havingness
person with no money" but that "I could do it". One time she
(good-naturedly, and with good humor) put her hands around my neck to act like
she was strangling me in frustration, saying "Don’t sell yourself short
like this!" as I paid my FPed amount.
When my membership finally expired, Deanna told me that I
couldn’t be on course without being an IAS member. Having studied the policies
on membership very thoroughly, and being an Ethics Specialist, I knew this was
untrue and asked her to show me the reference. She could not show me any
reference. I began to feel like I was attending course "despite not being
an IAS member" - something no where in policy and not any kind of a standard
for ethical behavior of a student.
I continued to make payments and Deanna continued to accept
them. One night, on Tuesday, the 16th of November, I received a
message from Deanna that she wanted to speak to me before course. My next
payment was due, so I had planned to see her anyway to make my payment. I went
in to the Atrium and sat down with her. Deanna's demeanor had totally changed.
She puffed out her shoulders and got up right in my face and said that she had
attended an IAS briefing and that she had decided that "this was total
bullshit" and that I was going to pay right now. I told her that I would
make my payment, but that, as we had discussed for over a month now, I was
applying standard finance policy and that I would not go any further into debt
for this or anything else.
This actually became a firefight. I set out my check card to
make my payment and she refused it, saying that wouldn't accept any more of my
payments. I told her that I had done a lot of conditions on this, and that it
was abundantly clear to me that people who pressure me to go into debt and off
finance policy are not my friends. There are plenty of references on this, not
the least of which is 18 February 1982 CHANGING WORKABLE FINANCE SYSTEMS.
She, again, said that I shouldn’t be on course without my
membership paid for. I got up to get away from her and make the payment to Tim
Edwards. Then I saw that it was three minutes to course time and so I turned
around to go upstairs and Deanna was there. She took me by the hand and tried
to" 8C" me to Ethics. I told her that I was going to course, so she
rode the elevator with me. She accused me of "using policy to stop",
even though there was no stop as I had been making payments all along and would
have made one to her had she not refused it.
I walked in just before roll call and Deanna stood outside. After
roll, as I began getting set up for course, I saw Deanna come into the course
room and start whispering into the supervisor's ear. Then, later, I saw Deanna
come back into the course room and place a piece of paper into the Sup's inbox.
It was extremely distracting but I continued on with my drill anyway.
Five minutes later, the Supervisor Joey Chait, came up to me
during a drill with an ethics routing form and told me that I was being taken
off course and routed to ethics. I took it and went downstairs to ethics. The
KR was stapled shut to the RF. (I personally did not receive a copy and still
do not have one. It should be available in my EO file.)
The ethics officer unstapled the KR and showed it to me and
had me explain what happened. The KR said that I had told Deanna that anyone
who tried to force me to go into debt was not a friend on of mine. It said
further that this was "enemy line"
and that "the string should be
pulled".
I explained the situation that had just occurred with Deanna
and asked to see any policy that I had been violating. I was fully willing to
look at any overt that I might be committing that I'm not seeing. He said he couldn't
think of a policy I might be violating,
and didn’t mention any overt that I might be committing. He sent me to go see
the video of the latest IAS event. I was taken off course at 8pm and sat and
watched the video until 10pm. Then I went to Tim Edwards and paid the $50
payment I had always intended to pay.
On the following Saturday, my twin offered to lend me the
money so that I could pay for my membership and I would pay her back on the
same FP schedule that I would be paying the IAS. I accepted this and my
membership is now paid, and I am, once again, in debt for it.
I write this because the pressure that was used to get me to
quit applying standard LRH finance policy was tremendous, even threatening my
progress on the Bridge by verbally stating a fictitious policy that
"students shouldn’t be on course without their IAS memberships in
force" and threatening to try to take me off course, despite no policy
regarding this at all.
I also write this because the KR that Deanna wrote was not
filed in my ethics file, per the policies on the matter, with me receiving a
copy, but was used to actually take me
off course in an emergency manner and being made to explain a KR which showed
no evidence of a crime or even an off-policy action. This is actually a
non-standard handling of ethics reports.
HCOPL 1 MAY 1965 STAFF MEMBER REPORTS states, "The most
serious reports, which are the only ones taken up at once, are technical
alter-is, noncompliance, any false reports, false attestations, no-reports,
misdemeanors, crimes and high crimes. The others are left to accumulate (except
in Emergency when all reports on that portion or org are taken up at
once)."
HCOPL 17 MARCH 1965 RIGHTS OF A STAFF MEMBER, STUDENTS AND
PRECLEARS TO JUSTICE, states, "There are no student rules and regulations
except the Justice Codes. All others are abolished…"
This is true,
Alanzo
************************

0 comments:
Post a Comment
Comment to your heart's content.